1-888-528-1216

Online Profile

Profiles allow you to post comments and manage your email preferences.

Make sure to accept cookies from www.aier.org to login



 Make a Donation
 Become a Member
Renew Your Membership

AIER Bookstore

College Destinations Index
Message Digest Algorithm 5 is a one way hashing algorithm. This site indexes md5 hashes and allows you to look up potential plain text versions of an md5 hash, a md5 hash crack.
Big Government Under the Bush Administration PDF Print E-mail
Written by Richard M. Ebeling   
Sunday, 16 November 2008 00:00

During the recent presidential campaign, a persistent question was whether the election of the Democratic candidate threatened a major growth in government spending. As a benchmark for future comparison, it is worthwhile to take a look at by how much the federal government has grown over the last eight years under the Bush Administration.

When President George W. Bush entered the White House in January 2001, the federal government had total revenues of slightly more than $2.03 trillion and expenditures of $1.79 trillion, leaving a budget surplus of slightly less than $240 billion.

The following graph traces the growth in federal government tax receipts and expenditures and resulting surpluses or deficits over the last eight years.

Federal Government Budget

Source: The 2008 Statistical Abstract, U.S. Census Bureau

Since 2000, government spending has increased by more than 55 percent. Even when adjusted for inflation in constant (2000) dollars, federal expenditures have risen by just short of 29 percent. During this same period, real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has only increased by 17.3 percent. Thus, over the last eight years real government spending has gone up nearly twice as fast as the actual U.S. economy.

When the Clinton Administration left the White House, federal spending was 18.4 percent of GDP. In 2008, at the close of the Bush Administration, federal expenditure is 20.5 percent of GDP, for an 11.4 percent increase over the last eight years. 

Washington has run deficits almost every year during the Bush Administration. Total federal debt has doubled and has risen from 58 percent to 66 percent of GDP, for a 14 percent increase in U.S. taxpayers’ debt burden in terms of GDP. 

Where has all this additional spending gone? The table below shows the growth in government spending from 2000 to 2007 by general types and categories in constant dollars. (It is not a full and comprehensive list.)

  Federal Government Constant (2000) Dollar Outlays, 2000-2007 by General Type and Category
  (Billions of Dollars)
 20002007% Increase
National Defense294.4475.1
61
Non-Defense Total*1,4951837.1
23
    Payment for Individuals
1054.61397.1

32

        Social Security and Railroad Retirement410.5487.719
        Federal Employees Retirement and Insurance100.3116.0
16
        Unemployment Insurance21.127.128
        Medical Care362.7559.9
54
        Student Assistance10.924.9
129
        Housing Assistance24.127.0
12
        Food and Nutrition Assistance32.446.3
43
        Public Assistance and Related Programs88.3103.417
        Other Transfers to Individuals4.34.7
10
 *Items also include All Other Grants, Net Interest, Off-budget amounts, and Undistributed offsetting receipt.

Source: The 2008 Statistical Abstract, U.S. Census Bureau

By any measure, there has been an explosion in government spendingin both the defense and non-defense categories. Not surprisingly with the two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, defense spending has risen during the Bush Administration by 61 percent in constant dollars. 

But “big government” domestic expenditures also have gotten a lot bigger during the presidency of George W. Bush. Welfare state spending has increased by 32 percent in constant dollars from what it was at the end of the Clinton Administration. 

Medical Care expenditures by the federal government (which includes Medicare, Medicaid, hospital and medical care for veterans, substance abuse and mental health services) has gone up by 54 percent in constant dollars under the current Republican administration. 

Not far behind, Food and Nutrition Assistance (which includes food stamps, child nutrition, and special milk programs, supplemental food programs) has increased 43 percent since 2000. 

Social Security and related payments have risen by 19 percent. Public Assistance (which includes family support payments to states, low income home energy assistance, earned income tax credits, legal services, payments to states for daycare assistance, payments to states for foster care/adoption assistance, and other related services) have gone up 17 percent. Housing assistance has increased by 12 percent. Federal student loans and related programs have increased by 129 percent. 

The incoming Obama administration will have to work very hard if it wants to exceed the Bush administration in growing the welfare state during its term in office.

Bookmark this article:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
 
Comments (6)
Thank You
6 Tuesday, 23 December 2008 20:49
Writer to the World
I've used this article as a source for an article of my own. Your organization is a much needed asset to democracy. Please keep up the good work, because without you, power can tell us anything at all and get away with it.
AIER as a non-partisan institute.
5 Tuesday, 02 December 2008 14:47
Jeffrey L. Porrello
I was glad to see Mr. Ebeling's article for the truth it laid bare. I once, quite recently, accused AIER of having a conservative bias because of the "The Global Warming Debate: Science, Economics and Policy" DVD, but the above article reaffirms my belief that I can in fact get honest views from a factual standpoint. Yes, "W" is the worst president this country has ever had to bear. Lets give Mr. Obama a chance before we start accusing him of outspending "W" as A. Alizo does below. I believe if we can get enough of the obstructionist far-right republicans (like "The Firewall", Saxby Chambliss - US Senator for Georgia) out of the way, we may actually be able to get this country back to some semblance of sanity and regain respect from the outside world!
Bush is a sorry excuse for a Republican!
4 Thursday, 20 November 2008 22:54
A. Alizo
Yes, it's certainly true that Bush has been one of the WORST US PRESIDENTS IN HISTORY. And I say this as a former Republican, and now Libertarian that voted for Ron Paul. "W" is a BIG Government politician of the worst kind. Besides destroying the Republican party, his most durable legacy may be that of putting in power a leftist Democratic administration that will finish the job he started: that of spending the US into oblivion and "Banana Republic" status. Thanks Georgie!
Balanced budget
3 Wednesday, 19 November 2008 09:04
C.W. Krimmel
I am surprised you use such partisan arguments. You do not note that Clinton had a Republican Congress to deal with that had made a commitment to a balanced budget. Nor do you point out that Bush faced numerous disasters, including 9-11 and Katrina. The Democrats also pushed costly Farm subsidies and other Big Government solutions.
Balanced Budget
2 Wednesday, 19 November 2008 00:08
Bob Alterman
Paul Meyer has a good point. Without the Social Security "surplus" being diverted to the general fund by the crooked politicians, what would the federal income, outgo and deficit curves look like?
Balanced Budget?
1 Tuesday, 18 November 2008 18:42
Paul K Meyer
I would love to see the income and expense numbers with Social Security shown excluded from both.
One chart for SS alone and another for the rest of federal income and spending.
I would like to see these numbers of 25 or 30 years.
Then we could truly see if we had a "balanced budget" and what we might have to do to get there as a country.
As disturbing as your charts are now the new ones would be a lot scarier.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification: